<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It’s All Related</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/2009/10/22/it%e2%80%99s-all-related/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/2009/10/22/it%e2%80%99s-all-related/</link>
	<description>Atlanta Skeptics: Y&#039;all got evidence?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: There goes the neighborhood, maybe.</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/2009/10/22/it%e2%80%99s-all-related/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>There goes the neighborhood, maybe.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/?p=163#comment-378</guid>
		<description>[...] Jerry referenced in his last post, the Scientologists have been eyeing an old office building at Glenridge and Roswell Road. They [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jerry referenced in his last post, the Scientologists have been eyeing an old office building at Glenridge and Roswell Road. They [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Severin</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/2009/10/22/it%e2%80%99s-all-related/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>James Severin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/?p=163#comment-375</guid>
		<description>@Maria
Was that a &quot;V&quot; reference??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Maria<br />
Was that a &#8220;V&#8221; reference??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Severin</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/2009/10/22/it%e2%80%99s-all-related/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>James Severin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/?p=163#comment-374</guid>
		<description>@ BubbaRich
As I understand it your characterization of Bill Maher is spot on, while he derides 9/11 &quot;truthers&quot; as nuts and has been awarded the &quot;Richard Dawkins Award&quot; for his movie &quot;Religulous&quot;, he continues to bash Western Medicine.  He was spouting Anti-vax nonsense on his program, and this leads to the confusion of Bill Maher.  How can he be critical of 9/11 &quot;truthers&quot; and religion, and then totally uncritical of vaccines and medicine in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ BubbaRich<br />
As I understand it your characterization of Bill Maher is spot on, while he derides 9/11 &#8220;truthers&#8221; as nuts and has been awarded the &#8220;Richard Dawkins Award&#8221; for his movie &#8220;Religulous&#8221;, he continues to bash Western Medicine.  He was spouting Anti-vax nonsense on his program, and this leads to the confusion of Bill Maher.  How can he be critical of 9/11 &#8220;truthers&#8221; and religion, and then totally uncritical of vaccines and medicine in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BubbaRich</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/2009/10/22/it%e2%80%99s-all-related/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>BubbaRich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/?p=163#comment-373</guid>
		<description>I missed this last week James.  I have to assume you mean that Bill Maher is a good example of NOT basing his skepticism on evidence.  He is a contrarian who seems to pick whichever side will make the most noise and the funnies jokes, and which one he can get the most spittle-flecking people on his side.  I see no evidence of critical thinking from him.  He doesn&#039;t weigh evidence, he weighs who gets the points in a debate or shouting match.  I haven&#039;t seen him much in a few years, but the bits I&#039;ve seen (and the reviews of Religulous) confirm this impression.  Offhand, after seeing how he approaches religion, medicine, and evolution, I couldn&#039;t guess which side he would be on with the 9/11 Truthers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed this last week James.  I have to assume you mean that Bill Maher is a good example of NOT basing his skepticism on evidence.  He is a contrarian who seems to pick whichever side will make the most noise and the funnies jokes, and which one he can get the most spittle-flecking people on his side.  I see no evidence of critical thinking from him.  He doesn&#8217;t weigh evidence, he weighs who gets the points in a debate or shouting match.  I haven&#8217;t seen him much in a few years, but the bits I&#8217;ve seen (and the reviews of Religulous) confirm this impression.  Offhand, after seeing how he approaches religion, medicine, and evolution, I couldn&#8217;t guess which side he would be on with the 9/11 Truthers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Jobe</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/2009/10/22/it%e2%80%99s-all-related/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Jobe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/?p=163#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Lizard people. Ha. (Hiss...) There&#039;s no such thing.

(fades into background)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lizard people. Ha. (Hiss&#8230;) There&#8217;s no such thing.</p>
<p>(fades into background)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/2009/10/22/it%e2%80%99s-all-related/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/?p=163#comment-370</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s all very well and good but you&#039;ll be sorry when the lizard people come for you... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s all very well and good but you&#8217;ll be sorry when the lizard people come for you&#8230; <img src='http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Severin</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/2009/10/22/it%e2%80%99s-all-related/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>James Severin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantaskeptics.com/?p=163#comment-366</guid>
		<description>I think that you bring up a key point,&quot;wherever the evidence leads.&quot;  This I think is the central tenet of a skeptic.  As I cruise my favorite blogs it surprises me the people who calls themselves &quot;skeptics&quot; and how they support vaccination but then go on to say that they have &quot;serious questions&quot; about the collapse of building 7.  It&#039;s ridiculous.

Bill Maher is a great example of this type of thinking, skepticism should be based on finding the truth based on evidence, and not fitting evidence to your truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that you bring up a key point,&#8221;wherever the evidence leads.&#8221;  This I think is the central tenet of a skeptic.  As I cruise my favorite blogs it surprises me the people who calls themselves &#8220;skeptics&#8221; and how they support vaccination but then go on to say that they have &#8220;serious questions&#8221; about the collapse of building 7.  It&#8217;s ridiculous.</p>
<p>Bill Maher is a great example of this type of thinking, skepticism should be based on finding the truth based on evidence, and not fitting evidence to your truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

